Archive for the 'Dodge' Category
Monday, February 18th, 2008
Dodge boys forecast 4150 pounds, which is just 62 pounds lighter than the 300C. With the same 6.1-liter Hemi V-8 (425 horsepower, 420 pound-feet of torque), the same five-speed automatic, and the same final drive, and the same tires, drag strip numbers figure to be pretty much the same, too. Still, you might wonder why the smaller coupe—at 197.7 inches it’s 2.5 inches shorter than a Charger and almost an inch lower—is nearly as heavy as the sedan. Eric Heuschele, manager of vehicle development at Chrysler’s Street and Racing Technology (SRT) skunkworks, says there’s no mystery. “For one thing, side-impact standards keep getting tougher all the time, and we had to compensate for losing that beefy Charger B-pillar,†says Heuschele. “But the real answer is that when you chop the wheelbase on a Charger you still have a Charger.†– Car and Driver
Posted in Dodge | Leave a Comment »
Monday, September 25th, 2006
Keep your right foot buried, though, and things start to go awry as the big Chrysler bounces from hump to bump, its tall 225/60/18 Pirelli P7s contributing to the impression that ride control is care of a space-hopper at each corner. Numb steering doesn’t improve the experience. – evo
Posted in Chrysler, Dodge, errata | Leave a Comment »
Monday, April 3rd, 2006
Mercedes Benz has long [sic] offered its S class in standard and long wheelbase forms (something Lexus wil be doing wth the new LS to be taken more seriously in the market).
Now Chrysler plans a stretched version of the 300C and Magnum.
The stretched 300C’s wheelbase is 152mm longer, all of which is used to enhance rear legroom… Chrysler says the added length of the stretched cars provides rear-seat passengers with nearly 1200mm of legroom. Customers will be able to order the cars with a host of personalised features, including lit writing tables, footrests and directional reading lights. – What Car?
Posted in Chrysler, Dodge | Leave a Comment »
Thursday, January 19th, 2006
You know how sometimes you just can’t help liking something, even if, deep down, you know it’s actually a bit wobbly. Think most old James Bond films… The Chrysler 300C’s a bit like that. Dynamically it’s a division below the big BMWs and Jags; it’s not madly quick; it doesn’t ride particularly well, and it’ll probably lose money like a drunk on a cattle-grid. And yet everyone here who drove the new right-hand-drive version of the top-of-the-range 5.7 ‘Hemi’ just loved it… The ride feels initially good, though much of that’s down to the deep sidewalls of the 225/60 R18 {Euro-spec] Pirelli P7s; at speed over even moderately uneven surfaces it lacks the damping control and general poise of the best Europeans. Not great, then, but immensely likeable. source: evo
Posted in Chrysler, Dodge | Leave a Comment »
Tuesday, January 17th, 2006
Posted in Dodge, Mercedes-Benz | Leave a Comment »
Thursday, December 22nd, 2005
Click here. (We’re speechless).
Posted in Chrysler, Dodge, Jeep | Leave a Comment »
Tuesday, December 20th, 2005
For Americans, bigger is always better. Europeans generally understand that a dirty great engine pumping out sufficient power to light a small town doesn’t necessarily make a good sports car. But not our friends from over the Atlantic, hence the 8.3-litre Dodge Viper. source: AutoExpress
Posted in Dodge, errata, technical | Leave a Comment »