carcounsel.com |HID|

Nearly two decades ago the Honda/Acura NSX shook up the performance car scene.

This year, the Nissan GT-R is said to be doing the same.

But could the two cars be any more different?

Looking at this picture I stumbled across on the web – is the NSX is too much like a Formula 1 car or is the GT-R is too much like an SUV?

When I started blogging I was hellbent on two things: that I not accept advertising dollars and that the blog be text only (to ensure that readers were here to learn not to skim as so many armchair experts do).

Well, I’ve changed my tune. From now on you’ll be seeing more pictures and – who knows? – maybe even some hand picked advertising.

Let me know what you think – if it doesn’t work for my readers I’m happy to remain a luddite.

Do you like your cars analogue or digital? With an inherently low CG and body weight or with a lot of technology to compensate for a high CG and a more portly whole?

As Peter Tomalin points out in this month’s evo...

Yes it still rolls a bit, certainly more than an Evo, which also has sharper steering responses, but there’s an honesty and transparency to the STI, a kind of analogue feel, that’s very appealing.

I’m not arguing for one over the other, I’m arguing against anyone who obsesses over numbers and spec sheets when buying cars.

Up to now, I’d thought there were five basic types of stare. The Truly Gobsmacked (Veyron, Zonda, Koenigsegg), the Knowing Nod (Audi R8, Nissan GT-R, Merc CLK Black), the Cute As Hell Grin (new Fiat 500, old Fiat 500), the Call That A Car Smirk (Vauxhall Tigra, Toyota Prius, Fiat Croma) and There’s Something Nasty on The Sole of My Shoe (BMW X6, SsangYong Rodius, Merc R-Class). But the Clubman has created a sixth category: the Huh? It’s neither approving nor dismissive, just the facial manifestation of a question mark. As in “I wish I could put my finger on it, but why hasn’t this worked?”... [Compare this with the] very tidy previous-generation Cooper S hatch, a car that actually seems to get prettier with age, though I’ve no doubt this has something to do with the comparatively bloated appearance of its larger successor. Inside, too, the earlier car’s leaner, edgier, less clunkingly exaggerated architecture seems far sexier and more inviting. – evo

The problem is that the Ralliart is a heavy machine, what with all that transmission, and the SST transmission has an annoyingly tardy getaway. All would be forgiven were the Ralliart a rousing drive, but for all its claimed power the engine never really lets rip. You find yourself revving it to death to goad it along, easily done given the strange shortness of the intermediate gear ratios, and it’s much harder work than a torquey turbomotor should be. It sounds nondescript, too. But it will all come good in the corners, yes? No. This Lancer really misses its tougher brother’s AYC and the resultant favourable torque distribution to each rear wheel. There’ll be no lovely powerslides here; go too quickly into a tight bend and it understeers like the nose-heavy car it is. – evo