<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>carcounsel.com &#124;HID&#124;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://carcounsel.com/hid/index.php/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://carcounsel.com/hid</link>
	<description>finding the signal in an industry filled with noise</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 02:51:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>RWD? AWD? FWD?</title>
		<link>http://carcounsel.com/hid/index.php/2009/07/11/rwd-awd-fwd/</link>
		<comments>http://carcounsel.com/hid/index.php/2009/07/11/rwd-awd-fwd/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 04:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daanesh</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[errata]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[technical]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carcounsel.com/hid/index.php/2005/09/20/rwd-awd-fwd/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[	Is one better than the other? A thinking engineer would cagily answer, &#8220;it depends.&#8221; Front drive is the Spocklike logical solution in low-power compact cars with high-mileage ambitions. Speed freaks swear by the Velcro traction of all-wheel drive, particularly if their engines are percolating more power than their tires can pour. And rear drive is [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://carcounsel.com/hid/index.php/2009/07/11/rwd-awd-fwd/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
