Archive for the 'Porsche' Category

alow myself to introduce… myself

Wednesday, June 7th, 2006

I recently stumbled upon an article I wasn’t aware I had been quoted in over a year ago. The topic: the prospect of Porsche building a Cayenne Hybrid using Toyota technology and the potential of an 5 hybrid. Here are the excerpts…

According to [the] founder of auto research firm carcounsel.com, the Cayenne already suffers an identity crisis. “It’s no secret Cayenne is a way to make a quick buck, a necessary evil so Porsche can afford to further develop their performance cars without having to become mass market, as BMW is doing,” he said. “But from a company that claims there is ‘no substitute’, it’s difficult to imagine where a Toyota-powered Cayenne fits in.”
“BMW has a tradition of waiting to learn from the mistakes of first generation products rushed to market by other companies,” Chanduwadia said. “Witness the X5 itself – it trailed the Mercedes Benz ML to market but made it look antiquated in comparison.” He said he expects BMW, with its “more long-sighted approach” to put hybrid technology in the next generation of the X5 model [at earliest].

would a Boxster bore you?

Wednesday, May 3rd, 2006

On paper and in motion the Porsche Boxster is a textbook example of how a car should be laid out (flat engine mounted in the middle of the chassis) and dialed in (rigid body, uncorrupted steering, low inertia handling, a suspension that maintains body control and travel). But some have said of Boxster (and Cayman) that it lacks the edge that makes the 911 so rewarding – its not just the fact that the power’s been capped to protect the 911’s sales numbers but rather the sense that anyone and their 16 year old could extract all it has.

Now that M engineers have stripped the Z4 of electric steering and runflat tires and stuffed it full of motor, magazines are running a string of ubiquitous comparisons, and I’m seeing a surprising trend: German cars, particularly BMWs, have often been criticised for lacking soul and being laden with too many electronics. The Z4M is a refreshing departure from that stereotype.

Here’s a quote from evo
:

Objectively, the Boxster S should win. It copes more convincingly with a wider range of roads and conditions thanks to polished damping, silken steering and a benign, infinitely adjustable on-limit balance. It’s not challenging but, given a clear road, it is totally absorbing. However, if you’ve stepped out of the M Roadster…the Porsche feels a bit flat, lacking poke and playfulness… The M Roadster…doesn’t set a new benchmark for sports car dynamics (that accolade still belongs to the Boxster), but it’s a bold, ballsy car that exhilarates and challenges in a way the oh-so-accomplished Porsche can’t match… that’s enough to give it the nod by the narrowest of margins.

“Did Porsche intentionally neuter the Cayman?”

Thursday, March 9th, 2006

That’s the question we’ve been asking ourselves since the model’s final specs became public.

After viewing this video and reading the following excerpt, you’ll see why…

Most agreed that except in terms of raw power, the Cayman provided the better overall driving experience. Straight-line acceleration is the performance parameter by which Porsche has chosen to separate these siblings, with the Cayman forbidden from outsprinting its big brother. In addition to docking the Cayman 10 percent in the power and torque departments, the transmission was also hobbled with gearing that’s 6 percent taller in first and second gears. The result is a launch to 30 that’s 20 percent slower than the 911’s – a difference even the least astute customers should notice during a dealer demo drive. (That gap closes to seven percent by 60mph and to two percent by the quarter mile). – Motor Trend, 04.06

BMW Z4 vs Porsche Boxster - slideways

Wednesday, February 22nd, 2006

Click here to watch ‘em duke it out around a race circuit.

(Note the how grounded and composed the flat, mid-mounted engine makes the Boxster . What you can’t see – and what the commenators fail to mention – is the Porsche’s ineffably superior steering).

don’t try this at home

Monday, February 6th, 2006

If you haven’t watched this legendary promotional video of the RUF Yellowbird, you’re in for a treat…

Move over 911, here comes something leaner

Tuesday, November 1st, 2005

Manufacturers often play with numbers to keep their lower priced models from stealing sales from more profitable, higher priced ones. Understating the power output of the standard engine is fairly common, and in some cases even the size of the standard engine is ‘hidden’ from the average person (e.g. Z3 2.3, E90 325i).

Porsche seems concerned that its Cayman will cannibalize sales from the 911, and they should be.

Porsche has a habit of ranking its cars by 3 metrics: price, time around the Nurburgring, and 0-60 time. We think mph’s Dan Pund sees through the numerical smoke and mirrors well in this month’s drive of the Cayman:

by the numbers, the Cayman S is closer to the Boxster S in terms of power and price. But…the Cayman’s weight-to-power ratio (10:1) is much closer to the Carerra’s than to the Boxster S’s—and this ratio is the single most critical measurment for preicting performance… Porsche says the 911 is faster than the Cayman S. That might be true on a long racetrack where the Carerra’s extra juice matters… The 911 has as much grip as the Cayman S but the Cayman makes you want to find the limit more often than does the 911, which is more prone to understeer.

Did we mention the Cayman is $10,400 less than the Carerra? We’d be tempted to get the Cayman and put the money saved towards the unsprung weight squashing ceramic brakes.

UPDATE Perhaps the best write-up we’ve come across yet is by one of our favorite writers of all time, Automobile’s Michael Jordan (the same man who a dozen years ago made a convincing argument for why he’d pick the VW Fox if money were no object).

Right behind your head, you can hear the 291-hp, 3.4-liter six-cylinder engine whirring with the same crisp, mechanical sound as an old air-cooled Porsche six. In contrast, the 911’s 321-hp, 3.6-liter six-cylinder has a bass note that’s rich and melodic but more distant, since it’s at the back of the car. The 911 Carrera’s engine is actually fractionally more responsive, because the mid-engined Cayman S’s complicated intake tract compromises the six’s throttle response…
the Cayman S’s 3.4-liter six has to work a bit harder on mountain roads… Fortunately, this six-speed manual is great, one of the few six-speed gearboxes that delivers shift action precise enough to afford quick, effortless gearchanges. For all that, the 911’s transmission sets a standard the Cayman’s can’t match, perhaps because the 911’s rear-engine layout affords a short, direct route for the shift linkage.
Its weight is pretty evenly distributed fore and aft (45.0 percent front/ 55.0 percent rear) compared with the 911 Carrera (38.4 percent front/61.6 percent rear), so the Cayman S feels poised and sure-footed even on the tightest mountain road. The heightened rigidity of the chassis also makes the steering action even more deliciously precise than the Boxster, yet without any harshness. To drive this car quickly, you simply point it where you want to go. The 911 Carrera is also a great car in similar circumstances, but it feels completely different. Its extreme weight distribution calls for more driving skill, as you use the accelerator pedal and brakes to shift weight back and forth to optimize grip during acceleration, braking, and cornering. As a result, the 911 feels like a much larger car with somewhat slower responses. Yet the 911 has far more personality than the Cayman, and the fact that the 911 is quieter and more composed on the freeway than the somewhat shrill Cayman also counts in its favor.
the Cayman S makes its way around the track with a completely different style. It slashes through corners as if it were a hologram from Gran Turismo 4, so obedient to the steering that it follows the racing line in demanding corners… almost effortlessly. In comparison, the 911 Carrera again seems somewhat bigger and clumsier, and it’s slower in the middle of a corner. Yet the 911’s reassuring stability under braking as it squeezes down on all four tires gives you more confidence… The Cayman is quick, precise, and consistent, while the 911 is simply fast, fast, fast.

could you distinguish the two from a distance?

Tuesday, November 1st, 2005

Click here for two profile shots of the Cayman and the 911 from a recent automobile road test.

Cayman S too good for the Porschephile?

Tuesday, October 4th, 2005

For some, taming the rear-engined 911s inherent dynamic snafus is part of the satisfaction of owning a Porsche – it’s a car that rewards a driver who respects its requests and is aware of its every step. The Boxster has long been considered technically superior (as its engine sits between the wheels rather than hanging out near the rear bumper) but some such as the editors at evo (and now 4Car ) think there’s something less satisfying about having a car that is idiot-proof.

the Boxster should now be thought of as the derivative and the compromised car… The only criticism we would think of levelling at the way it goes down a road is that, if anything, it is almost too good. For most people this could only be seen as a positive thing: but for those few Porsche die-hards who believe that reward is proportional to investment, it certainly lacks the unique challenge to skilled drivers laid down by the 911 and, ultimately, is perhaps less thrilling as a result.

Porsche and Lexus most reliable, MB and Kia least

Monday, October 3rd, 2005

According to this link…