Monday, February 18th, 2008
Dodge boys forecast 4150 pounds, which is just 62 pounds lighter than the 300C. With the same 6.1-liter Hemi V-8 (425 horsepower, 420 pound-feet of torque), the same five-speed automatic, and the same final drive, and the same tires, drag strip numbers figure to be pretty much the same, too. Still, you might wonder why the smaller coupe—at 197.7 inches it’s 2.5 inches shorter than a Charger and almost an inch lower—is nearly as heavy as the sedan. Eric Heuschele, manager of vehicle development at Chrysler’s Street and Racing Technology (SRT) skunkworks, says there’s no mystery. “For one thing, side-impact standards keep getting tougher all the time, and we had to compensate for losing that beefy Charger B-pillar,†says Heuschele. “But the real answer is that when you chop the wheelbase on a Charger you still have a Charger.†– Car and Driver
Posted in Dodge | Leave a Comment »
Saturday, February 9th, 2008
what an engine [the normally aspirated 3 liter 6] is. Sweet-spinning, sonorous and powerful… [but] Sold on its sporting credentials, enthusiastic drivers might at first be a little disappointed at the way the 1-Series drives. Turn into a corner briskly and the nose is always a little too keen to wash wide. Despite the impressive weight distribution, this is not a BMW that likes to corner with a tail-out stance… That said, ease off the pace a little and the BMW is still a fine back road companion – and a very quick one at that. Accept the 1-Series… as more of an elegant… mini-GT rather than a sportscar and you won’t come away disappointed. – 4car
Posted in BMW, errata | Leave a Comment »