Archive for November, 2005

magazines abuse the car to get their published 0-60 numbers; will you?

Wednesday, November 2nd, 2005
to get the long-term car’s numbers, we had to use the SMG’s launch-control feature, which involves depressing the Dynamic Stability Control button for three seconds, flooring the gas pedal, pulling the paddle or gearshift lever into first gear, and letting the computer select the optimal clutch-engagement point for maximum acceleration. Most owners wouldn’t drive this way on a normal basis, and neither do we. – Car and Driver

Corolla/Vibe/Matrix/Elise 1.8 gets supercharger

Wednesday, November 2nd, 2005

Here’s an excerpt from Auto Express’s coverage:

power jumps 26bhp to 215bhp…The supercharger combines well with the unit’s variable valve timing, too, filling in the gaps in the powerband at low revs. It’s refined, but doesn’t sound sporty and some characteristic supercharger whine would liven things up

One catch: it’s only available in the European Corolla (for now).

UPDATE: Now that 4Car has sampled the engine, here’s what they have to say:

a supercharger… boosts the T-Sport’s power by around 15% to a heady 215bhp and maximum torque by 19% to 158lb ft. An added bonus of fitting the supercharger to the T-Sport variable valve timed 1.8-litre engine is that the sweet point in the rev range – where torque and power are at their peak – is lower, at 4,000rpm, meaning you don’t need to rev the engine all the way to the 8,000rpm limiter to make decent progress. You wouldn’t actually want to venture too high up the rev range though, as the aural accompaniment isn’t exactly tuneful…

like bringing a knife to a gun fight - and winning

Wednesday, November 2nd, 2005

We believe a car’s packaging determines its potential, so we’re inclined to look past power figures to where the engine is placed, how heavy it is, etc.

The new M5’s V10 is stuffed in the nose and requires oversized components elsewhere to reign in all that power and mass. The Maserati Quattroporte conversely uses a (Ferrari) V8 set back farther in the body, making it more of a front-mid-engine car. The result?

the Maserati satisfies on a multitude of levels. It flows with such grace and poise, steers with such precision, adjusts its attitude so finely to minute flexes of foot and hands, and accelerates with such clean, free-revving enthusiasm, you become totally absorbed in the act of driving. It sounds like a cliché, but it shrinks around you, quite something for a car weighing a couple of tons and stretching five metres in length. And then you climb out and fall in love with it all over again, those indulgent swoops and feminine curves melding to create what must surely be the most beautiful saloon car of the modern era. Beauty is something that never entered BMW’s equation with the M5, but once you’ve driven the Maserati you’ll also conclude that delicacy also passed the Bavarians by. The balls-out Beemer may define the supersaloon breed, but the real joy of the Maserati is that it transcends the quest for more power, cylinders, gears and revs… nobody told the boys at Maserati that they had to play by BMW’s rules, which is why the Quattroporte is such a breath of fresh air, beating them all at their own game without ever appearing to demean itself by actually competing against them. source: evo

UPDATE: Watch this video from 3:05 on…

Move over 911, here comes something leaner

Tuesday, November 1st, 2005

Manufacturers often play with numbers to keep their lower priced models from stealing sales from more profitable, higher priced ones. Understating the power output of the standard engine is fairly common, and in some cases even the size of the standard engine is ‘hidden’ from the average person (e.g. Z3 2.3, E90 325i).

Porsche seems concerned that its Cayman will cannibalize sales from the 911, and they should be.

Porsche has a habit of ranking its cars by 3 metrics: price, time around the Nurburgring, and 0-60 time. We think mph’s Dan Pund sees through the numerical smoke and mirrors well in this month’s drive of the Cayman:

by the numbers, the Cayman S is closer to the Boxster S in terms of power and price. But…the Cayman’s weight-to-power ratio (10:1) is much closer to the Carerra’s than to the Boxster S’s—and this ratio is the single most critical measurment for preicting performance… Porsche says the 911 is faster than the Cayman S. That might be true on a long racetrack where the Carerra’s extra juice matters… The 911 has as much grip as the Cayman S but the Cayman makes you want to find the limit more often than does the 911, which is more prone to understeer.

Did we mention the Cayman is $10,400 less than the Carerra? We’d be tempted to get the Cayman and put the money saved towards the unsprung weight squashing ceramic brakes.

UPDATE Perhaps the best write-up we’ve come across yet is by one of our favorite writers of all time, Automobile’s Michael Jordan (the same man who a dozen years ago made a convincing argument for why he’d pick the VW Fox if money were no object).

Right behind your head, you can hear the 291-hp, 3.4-liter six-cylinder engine whirring with the same crisp, mechanical sound as an old air-cooled Porsche six. In contrast, the 911’s 321-hp, 3.6-liter six-cylinder has a bass note that’s rich and melodic but more distant, since it’s at the back of the car. The 911 Carrera’s engine is actually fractionally more responsive, because the mid-engined Cayman S’s complicated intake tract compromises the six’s throttle response…
the Cayman S’s 3.4-liter six has to work a bit harder on mountain roads… Fortunately, this six-speed manual is great, one of the few six-speed gearboxes that delivers shift action precise enough to afford quick, effortless gearchanges. For all that, the 911’s transmission sets a standard the Cayman’s can’t match, perhaps because the 911’s rear-engine layout affords a short, direct route for the shift linkage.
Its weight is pretty evenly distributed fore and aft (45.0 percent front/ 55.0 percent rear) compared with the 911 Carrera (38.4 percent front/61.6 percent rear), so the Cayman S feels poised and sure-footed even on the tightest mountain road. The heightened rigidity of the chassis also makes the steering action even more deliciously precise than the Boxster, yet without any harshness. To drive this car quickly, you simply point it where you want to go. The 911 Carrera is also a great car in similar circumstances, but it feels completely different. Its extreme weight distribution calls for more driving skill, as you use the accelerator pedal and brakes to shift weight back and forth to optimize grip during acceleration, braking, and cornering. As a result, the 911 feels like a much larger car with somewhat slower responses. Yet the 911 has far more personality than the Cayman, and the fact that the 911 is quieter and more composed on the freeway than the somewhat shrill Cayman also counts in its favor.
the Cayman S makes its way around the track with a completely different style. It slashes through corners as if it were a hologram from Gran Turismo 4, so obedient to the steering that it follows the racing line in demanding corners… almost effortlessly. In comparison, the 911 Carrera again seems somewhat bigger and clumsier, and it’s slower in the middle of a corner. Yet the 911’s reassuring stability under braking as it squeezes down on all four tires gives you more confidence… The Cayman is quick, precise, and consistent, while the 911 is simply fast, fast, fast.

why the M roadster is the only Z4 we’d purchase

Tuesday, November 1st, 2005

(Actually we’re waiting for the stiffer, more precise, more beautiful M Coupe but please read on…)

BMW has finally released details on the M roadster we gave chase to (and bloged about) over a month ago.

We’ve never considered the current Z4 a true BMW mostly due to its artificial electric steering, rough and slippery run-flat tires and quake inducing high unsprung weight. (This despite classic cues like squat under acceleration and a manual gearbox far easier to shift smoothly than the E46s…)

Apparently BMW agrees:

Unlike the ‘standard’ Z4 that uses an electromechanical steering system, the new Z4 M Roadster uses a hydraulic power assistance system. The ‘standard’ car also uses Run-flat tyres as opposed to the M Roadster’s non-Run-Flat items — both features that M, as a separate division, believes give the car its own ‘M’ character. These features are reinforced by BMW M’s floating compound high-performance braking system, originally conceived for the BMW M3 CSL… source: BMW

The fact that the car will also include a lower-redline version of the M3’s 3.2L I6 and its trick Variable M-differential lock
only solidifies things.

(Its a shame the steering and tire changes don’t apply to the whole line – the magnesium alloy block NG engines are much lighter on the nose than the cast iron M engine).

could you distinguish the two from a distance?

Tuesday, November 1st, 2005

Click here for two profile shots of the Cayman and the 911 from a recent automobile road test.